Diferenciação institucional na certificação de produtos orgânicos: uma comparação dos Organismos Participativos de Avaliação da Conformidade no estado do Rio Grande do Sul
Institutional differentiation in the certification of organic products: a comparison of the Participatory Conformity Assessment Bodies in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
Paulo Niederle; Claire Dorville; Sylvaine Lemeilleur
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Keywords
References
Åberg P. Managing expectations, demands and myths: Swedish study associations caught between civil society, the state and the market. Voluntas. 2013;24(3):537-58.
Allen P., Kovach M. The capitalist composition of organic: the potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. 2000;17(3):221-32.
Arvidson M., Lyon F. Social impact measurement and non-profit organisations: Compliance, resistance, and promotion. Voluntas. 2014;25(4):869-86.
Beckert J. Institutional isomorphism revisited: convergence and divergence in institutional change. Sociological Theory. 2010;28(2):150-66.
Boström M. Regulatory credibility and authority through inclusiveness: standardization organizations in cases of eco-labelling. Organization. 2006;13(3):345-67.
Boxenbaum E., Battilana J. Importation as innovation: transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization. 2005;3(4):355-83.
Boxenbaum E., Jonsson S. Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: concept evolution and theoretical challenges. The Sage Handbook of Institutional Institutionalism. 2017.
Buck D., Getz C., Guthman J. From farm to table: the organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis. 1997;37(1):3-20.
Caldas N. V., Anjos F. S., Bezerra A. J. A., Criado E. A. Certificação de produtos orgânicos: obstáculos à implantação de um sistema participativo de garantia na Andaluzia, Espanha. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural. 2012;50(3):455-72.
Cruz F. T., Ramos L., Fruhauf W., Bohrer S. Agroecologia e relações de proximidade entre produtores e consumidores: a experiência dos produtores da Rede Agroecológica Metropolitana (RAMA)/RS. Produção, Consumo e Abastecimento de Alimentos: desafios e novas estratégias.. 2016:215-24.
Dimaggio P., Powell W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. 1983;48(2):147-60.
Ellersgaard C., Larsen A., Munk M. A very economic elite: the case of the Danish top CEOs. Sociology. 2013;47(6):1051-71.
Fligstein N., McAdam D. A theory of fields. 2012.
Forni P., Leite L. El desarrollo y legitimación de las organizaciones del tercer sector en la Argentina: hacia la definición de un isomorfismo periférico. Sociologias. 2006;8(16):368-75.
Fouilleux E. Normes transnationales de développement durable. Formes et contours d’une privatisation de la délibération. Gouvernement et Action Publique. 2013;2(1):93-119.
Fouilleux E., Loconto A. Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: a tripartite model of techno-politics. Agriculture and Human Values. 2017;34(1):1-14.
Greenwood R., Oliver C., Lawrence T., Meyer R. The Sage Handbook of Institutional Institutionalism. 2017.
Greenwood R., Raynard M., Kodeih F., Micelotta E., Lounsbury M. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals. 2011;5(1):317-71.
Hannan M., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology. 1977;82(5):929-64.
Hassenteufel P. Sociologie politique: l’action publique. 2008.
Hatanaka M., Bain C., Busch L. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy. 2005;30(3):354-69.
Isaguirre K., Passos M. Certificação na prática: a Rede Ecovida e os desafios da implementação de sistemas participativos de garantia. Agroecologia: práticas, mercados e políticas para uma nova agricultura. 2013:362-87.
Jarvis D. Policy transfer, neo-liberalism or coercive institutional isomorphism? Explaining the emergence of a regulatory regime for quality assurance in the Hong Kong higher education sector. Policy and Society. 2014;33(3):237-52.
Lemeilleur S., Allaire G. Système participatif de garantie dans les labels du mouvement de l’agriculture biologique: une réappropriation des communs intellectuels. Économie Rurale (Paris). 2018;365(365):7-27.
Loconto A., Hatanaka M. Participatory Guarantee Systems: alternative ways of defining, measuring, and assessing sustainability. Sociologia Ruralis. 2018;58(2):412-32.
Loconto A., Poisot A., Santacoloma P. Innovative markets for sustainable agriculture.. 2016.
Mahoney J., Thelen K. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power.. 2009.
Medaets J.-P., Cechin A. D. A ação coletiva como facilitador da inovação no manejo orgânico: o caso do Sistema Participativo de Garantia. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura. 2019;27(1):118-36.
Medaets J.-P., Fornazier A., Thomé K. Transition to sustainability in agrifood systems: Insights from Brazilian trajectories. Journal of Rural Studies. 2020;76:1-11.
Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology. 1977;83(2):340-63.
Niederle P. Os agricultores ecologistas nos mercados para alimentos orgânicos: contramovimentos e novos circuitos de comércio. Sustentabilidade em Debate. 2014;5:79-96.
Niederle P., Radomsky G. Quem governa por dispositivos? A produção das normas e padrões para os alimentos orgânicos no Brasil. Tomo. 2017;30:227-65.
Niederle P., Wesz Junior V. As novas ordens alimentares.. 2018.
Niederle P., Grisa C., Picolotto E., Soldera D. Narrative disputes over family-farming public policies in Brazil: conservative attacks and restricted countermovements. Latin American Research Review. 2019;54(3):707-20.
Niederle P., Loconto A., Lemeilleur S., Dorville C. Social movements and institutional change in organic food markets: Evidence from participatory guarantee systems in Brazil and France. Journal of Rural Studies. 2020;78:282-91.
Ostrom E. Understanding institutional diversity. 2009.
Peci A. A nova teoria institucional em estudos organizacionais: uma abordagem crítica. Cadernos EBAPE.BR. 2006;4(1):1-12.
Petersen P., Mussoi E., Dal Soglio F. Institutionalization of the agroecological approach in Brazil: advances and challenges. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 2013;37(1):103-14.
Radaelli C. Policy transfer in the European Union: institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions. 2000;13(1):25-43.
Radomsky G. F. W. O poder do selo.. 2015.
Ramanath R. Limits to institutional isomorphism: examining internal processes in NGO-government interactions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2009;38(1):51-76.
Rosset P., Altieri M. Agroecology versus input substitution: a fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture. Society & Natural Resources. 1997;10(3):283-95.
Thévenot L. Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. The practice turn in contemporary theory. 2001:56-73.
Submitted date:
06/04/2019
Accepted date:
06/21/2020