Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
http://www.resr.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1806-9479.2022.264953
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
ARTICLE

Potential impacts of reducing the microregional yield gaps for main food crops in Brazil

Impactos potenciais da redução do hiato de rendimento microrregional das principais culturas alimentares no Brasil

Arlei Luiz Fachinello; Cárliton Vieira dos Santos; Dimitri Bessa

Downloads: 0
Views: 197

Abstract

This study aimed to measure yield gaps and the potential gains in production and revenue from mitigating these gaps for the four main food crops in Brazil and worldwide (rice, maize, soybean, and wheat). Based on the concepts of potential yield, observed yield, and yield gap, and data from the 2017 Brazilian Agricultural Census, a parameter for the potential yield of each crop was defined at the microregional level, and yield gaps and potential gains in production and revenue resulting from reducing these gaps were measured. The results showed that reducing yield gaps in Brazil for the analyzed crops may lead to an expansion in supply of these food products by almost 10% of the volume achieved in 2017, or the equivalent of 19 million tons. The greatest potential gains in yield and production were found for maize, 13.2%, valued at about US$ 1.7 billion (at 2017 prices). Soybean showed the lowest potential for gains in percentage terms (5.5%), but these gains would represent US$ 1.8 billion, the highest value among the crops analyzed.

Keywords

food security, yield gap, food crops in Brazil

Resumo

Resumo: Este estudo teve como objetivo mensurar os hiatos de rendimento e os ganhos potenciais de produção e receita advindos da redução desses hiatos para as quatro principais culturas alimentares do Brasil e do mundo (arroz, milho, soja e trigo). Baseado nos conceitos de rendimento potencial, rendimento observado e hiato de rendimento, e em dados do Censo Agropecuário Brasileiro de 2017, definiu-se um parâmetro para o rendimento potencial de cada cultura, em nível microrregional, e mensuraram-se os hiatos de rendimento e os ganhos potenciais de produção e receita decorrentes da redução desses hiatos. Os resultados revelaram que a redução dos hiatos de rendimento no Brasil para as culturas analisadas pode permitir a ampliação da oferta dessas culturas alimentares em quase 10% do volume registrado em 2017, ou 19 milhões de toneladas. Para o milho foram encontrados os maiores ganhos potenciais em rendimento e produção, 13,2%, valorados em cerca de R$ 5,5 bilhões (a preços de 2017). Já para a soja, identificou-se o menor potencial de ganhos em termos percentuais (5,5%), mas que representariam R$ 5,7 bilhões, o maior valor entre as culturas analisadas.

Palavras-chave

segurança alimentar, hiato de rendimento, culturas alimentares no Brasil

Referências

Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012). World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA working paper no. 12-03. Retrieved in 2021, April 9, from https://www.fao.org/agrifood-economics/publications/detail/en/c/147899/

Andrea, M. C. S., Bootle, K. J., Sentelhas, P. C., & Romanelli, T. L. (2018). Variability and limitations of maize production in Brazil: potential yield, water-limited yield and yield gaps. Agricultural Systems, 165, 264-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.07.004.

Battisti, R., Sentelhas, P. C., & Pascoalino, J. A. L. (2018). Soybean yield gap in the areas of yield contest in Brazil. International Journal of Plant Production, 12(3), 159-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42106-018-0016-0.

Cole, M. B., Augustin, M. A., Robertson, M. J., & Manners, J. M. (2018). The science of food security. npj Science of Food, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-018-0021-9.

Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento - CONAB. (2015). A cultura do arroz. Retrieved in 2023, May 20, from https://biblioteca.conab.gov.br/phl82/pdf/2015_Cultura_do_arroz.pdf

Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento - CONAB. (2017). A cultura do trigo. Retrieved in 2023, May 20, from https://www.conab.gov.br/uploads/arquivos/17_04_25_11_40_00_a_cultura_do_trigo_versao_digital_final.pdf

Dawe, D., & Dobermann, A. (1999). Defining productivity and yield. Makati: International Rice Research Institute. IRRI discussion paper series.

Dias, H. B., & Sentelhas, P. C. (2018). Sugarcane yield gap analysis in Brazil - a multi-model approach for determining magnitudes and causes. Science of the Total Environment, 637-638, 1127-1136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.017.

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa. (2018). Informações técnicas para trigo e triticale: safra 2019. Brasília: Embrapa.

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa. (2019). Cultivares de soja. Retrieved in 2023, May 20, from http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/128705/1/cataologo-soja.5.2015.pdf

Fischer, R. A. (2015). Definitions and determination of crop yield, yield gaps, and of rates of change. Field Crops Research, 182, 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.006.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO. (2017). The future of food and agriculture: trends and challenges. Rome: FAO.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO. (2020). Retrieved in 2021, April 9, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO. International Fund for Agricultural Development - IFAD. United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund - UNICEF. World Food Programme - WFP. World Health Organization - WHO. (2019). The state of food security and nutrition in the world. Retrieved in 2020, September 14, from https://www.fao.org/3/ca5162en/ca5162en.pdf

Gasques, J. G., Bastos, E. T., Valdes, C., & Bacchi, M. R. P. (2014). Produtividade da agricultura: resultados para o Brasil e estados selecionados. Revista de Política Agrícola, 23(3), 87-98. Retrieved in 2023, May 20, from https://seer.sede.embrapa.br/index.php/RPA/article/view/943

Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. C., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383.

Helfand, S. M., Magalhães, M. M., & Rada, N. E. (2015). Brazil’s agricultural total factor productivity growth by farm size. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. Working paper nº 609 (IDB-WP-609).

Hertel, T. W., & Baldos, U. L. C. (2016). Global change and the challenges of sustainably feeding a growing planet. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22662-0.

Hirakuri, M. H., & Lazzarotto, J. J. (2014). O agronegócio da soja nos contextos mundial e brasileiro. Londrina: Embrapa Soja.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. (2020a). Retrieved in 2021, April 9, from https://censoagro2017.ibge.gov.br/

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. (2020b). Retrieved in 2021, April 9, from https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria/9117-producao-agricola-municipal-culturas-temporarias-e-permanentes.html?=&t=o-que-e

Ittersum, M. K. V., Cassman, K. G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., & Hochman, Z. (2013). Field crops research yield gap analysis with local to global relevance — a review. Field Crops Research, 143, 4-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009.

Langeveld, J. W. A., Dixon, J., Keulen, H. V., & Quist-Wessel, F. (2014). Analyzing the effect of biofuel expansion on land use in major producing countries: evidence of increased multiple cropping. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, 8(1), 49-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1432.

Licker, R., Johnston, M., Foley, J. A., Barford, C., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, C., & Ramankytty, N. (2010). Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the “yield gap” of croplands around the world? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(6), 769-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00563.x.

Liu, G.-Z., Liu, W. M., Hou, P., Ming, B., Yang, Y. S., Guo, X. X., Xie, R. Z., Wang, K. R., & Li, S. K. (2021). Reducing maize yield gap by matching plant density and solar radiation. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(2), 363-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63363-9.

Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G., & Field, C. B. (2009). Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 179-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740.

Merlos, F. A., Monzon, J. P., Mercau, J. L., Taboada, M., Andrade, F. H., Hall, A. J., Jobbagy, E., Cassman, K. G., & Grassini, P. (2015). Potential for crop production increase in Argentina through closure of existing yield gaps. Field Crops Research, 184, 145-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.001.

Ministério do Meio Ambiente - MMA. (2006). Plano nacional de recursos hídricos: síntese executiva. Brasília: MMA.

Nóia Júnior, R. S., & Sentelhas, P. C. (2020). Yield gap of the double-crop system of main-season soybean with off-season maize in Brazil. Crop & Pasture Science, 71(5), 445-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CP19372.

Rezende, G. C. (1986). Crescimento econômico e oferta de alimentos no Brasil. Revista de Economia Política, 6(1), 64-80.

Sassi, M. (2018). Understanding food insecurity: key features, indicators, and response design. Cham: Springer. Food security basics, pp. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70362-6_1.

Sentelhas, P. C., Battisti, R., Câmara, G. M. S., Farias, J. R. B., Hampf, A. C., & Nendel, C. (2015). The soybean yield gap in Brazil - magnitude, causes and possible solutions for sustainable production. Journal of Agricultural Science, 153(8), 1394-1411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859615000313.

Sentelhas, P. C., Battisti, R., Monteiro, L. A., Duarte, Y. C. N., & Visses, F. A. (2016). Yield gap - conceitos, definições e exemplos. Informações Agronômicas, 15, 9-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247501.n4203.
 


Submetido em:
13/06/2022

Aceito em:
20/05/2023

650b3756a9539551a7336a52 resr Articles
Links & Downloads

resr

Share this page
Page Sections