Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
http://www.resr.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1806-9479.2026.301090
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sociotechnical transitions towards decarbonization of Brazilian Agriculture: the potential to scale innovative niche production systems

Transições sociotécnicas para a descarbonização da agricultura brasileira: o potencial de escalar sistemas de produção inovadores de nicho

Niels Søndergaard; Claudia Cheron König; Camila Dias de Sá

Downloads: 1
Views: 159

Abstract

Brazil’s agricultural frontier and land-use change make decarbonization a central challenge for meeting climate targets while sustaining productivity. This article applies the multilevel perspective (MLP) to compare three innovative niches with low‑carbon potential: crop–livestock–forestry integration (CLFi), cabruca cocoa agroforestry in the Atlantic Forest, and the emerging forest restoration economy within various sociotechnical regime dimensions. The analysis draws on 42 semi‑structured interviews (2019–2024) with producers, civil‑society organizations, agribusiness, researchers and public officials, complemented by secondary quantitative indicators. We find that scaling these niches depends less on the existence of technical solutions than on (i) market and value‑chain coordination capable of rewarding environmental performance and (ii) institutional and knowledge infrastructures (credit, extension, standards and monitoring) that reduce entry costs and risks—especially for small and medium producers. Cross‑case comparison also shows that land governance and territorial inequalities condition both feasibility and benefit sharing. The paper contributes to sustainability transitions scholarship by grounding MLP concepts in Brazilian agrarian contexts and by identifying policy levers for scaling low‑carbon practices in tropical agri‑food systems.

Keywords

sustainable transitions, low-carbon agriculture, crop–livestock–forestry integration (CLFi), agroforestry, forest restoration, decarbonization, Brazil

Resumo

A expansão agropecuária e as mudanças no uso da terra tornam a descarbonização um desafio central para o Brasil cumprir metas climáticas mantendo a produtividade. Este artigo aplica a Perspectiva Multinível (PMN/MLP) para comparar três nichos inovadores com potencial de baixo carbono: integração lavoura‑pecuária‑floresta (ILPF), cacau cabruca na Mata Atlântica e a economia emergente da restauração florestal, dentro de diferentes dimensões do regime sociotécnico. A análise combina 42 entrevistas semiestruturadas (2019–2024) com produtores, organizações da sociedade civil, agronegócio, pesquisadores e gestores públicos e indicadores quantitativos secundários. Os resultados indicam que o escalonamento desses nichos depende menos da inexistência de soluções técnicas e mais de (i) coordenação de mercado e de cadeias de valor capaz de remunerar desempenho ambiental e (ii) infraestrutura institucional e de conhecimento (crédito, ATER, padrões e monitoramento) que reduza custos e riscos de adoção—sobretudo para pequenos e médios produtores. A comparação intersetorial também evidencia que governança fundiária e desigualdades territoriais condicionam viabilidade e distribuição de benefícios. O artigo contribui ao ancorar conceitos de transições sociotécnicas no contexto agrário brasileiro e ao apontar alavancas de política para ampliar práticas de baixo carbono em sistemas agroalimentares tropicais.

Palavras-chave

transições sustentáveis, agricultura de baixo carbono, integração lavoura‑pecuária‑floresta (ILPF), agrofloresta, restauração florestal, descarbonização, Brasil

Referências

Amazônia 2030. (2023). Oportunidades para a produção de cacau na Amazônia Brasileira. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://amazonia2030.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Oportunidades-para-a-producao-de-cacau-na-Amazonia-Brasileira.pdf.

Arantes, J. T. (2021). Estudo avança no entendimento da vassoura-de-bruxa, doença que derrubou a produção de cacau no Brasil. Agência FAPESP. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://agencia.fapesp.br/estudo-avanca-no-entendimento-da-vassoura-de-bruxa-doenca-que-derrubou-a-producao-de-cacau-no-brasil/36258.

Banco Nacional do Desenvolvimento (2025). Ponaf Jovem: Financiamentos. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.bndes.gov.br/wps/portal/site/home/financiamento/produto/pronaf-jovem.

Behling, M. (2024). Após 12 anos, pesquisa traz embasamento para plantio de árvores em sistemas ILPF. Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.embrapa.br/en/busca-de-noticias/-/noticia/91026692/apos-12-anos-pesquisa-traz-embasamento-para-plantio-de-arvores-em-sistemas-ilpf.

Bosi, C., Pezzopane, J. R. M., & Sentelhas, P. C. (2020). Soil water availability in a full sun pasture and in a silvopastoral system with eucalyptus. Agroforestry Systems, 94(2), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00402-7

Brainer, M. S. C. P. (2021). Produção de Cacau. Caderno Setorial ETENE, 6, 1-23. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.bnb.gov.br/revista/cse/article/view/2767

Brancalion, P. H. S., Hua, F., Joyce, F. H., Antonelli, A., & Holl, K. D. (2025). Moving biodiversity from an afterthought to a key outcome of forest restoration. Nature Reviews Biodiversity, 1(4), 248-261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-025-00032-1

Brancalion, P. H. S., Lamb, D., Ceccon, E., Boucher, D., Herbohn, J., Strassburg, B., & Edwards, D. P. (2017). Using markets to leverage investment in forest and landscape restoration in the tropics. Forest Policy and Economics, 85, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.009

Brasil. (2022). Agência Brasileira de Promoção de Exportações e Investimentos – Apex. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.gov.br/empresas-e-negocios/pt-br/invest-export-brasil/exportar/busque-apoio/agencia-brasileira-de-promocao-de-exportacoes-e-investimentos-apex.

Brasil. Ministério da Agriculura e Pecuária. (2023). Metas do ABC+. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/sustentabilidade/planoabc-abcmais/abc/metas-do-abc.

Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066

Bungenstab, D. J. (2012). Sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta: a produção sustentável. (2. ed.). Brasília, DF: Embrapa. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.embrapa.br/en/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/938814/sistemas-de-integracao-lavoura-pecuaria-floresta-a-producao-sustentavel.

Bustamante, M. M. C., Silva, J. S., Scariot, A., Sampaio, A. B., Mascia, D. L., Garcia, E., Sano, E., Fernandes, G. W., Durigan, G., Roitman, I., Figueiredo, I., Rodrigues, R. R., Pillar, V. D., de Oliveira, A. O., Malhado, A. C., Alencar, A., Vendramini, A., Padovezi, A., Carrascosa, H., Freitas, J., Siqueira, J. A., Shimbo, J., Generoso, L. G., Tabarelli, M., Biderman, R., Paiva Salomão, R., Valle, R., Junior, B., & Nobre, C. (2019). Ecological restoration as a strategy for mitigating and adapting to climate change: lessons and challenges from Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 24(7), 1249-1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9837-5

Carauta, M., Latynskiy, E., Mössinger, J., Gil, J., Libera, A., Hampf, A., Monteiro, L., Siebold, M., & Berger, T. (2018). Can preferential credit programs speed up the adoption of low-carbon agricultural systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil? Results from bioeconomic microsimulation. Regional Environmental Change, 18(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1104-x

Carter, S., Herold, M., Avitabile, V., Bruin, S., Sy, V., Kooistra, L., & Rufino, M. C. (2017). Agriculture-driven deforestation in the tropics from 1990–2015: emissions, trends and uncertainties. Environmental Research Letters, 13(1), 014002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9ea4

Cechin, A., da Silva Araújo, V., & Amand, L. (2021). Exploring the synergy between Community Supported Agriculture and agroforestry: Institutional innovation from smallholders in a Brazilian rural settlement. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.031

Chiapetti, J., Rocha, R. B., Conceição, A. S., Baiardi, A., Szerman, D., & VanWey, L. (2020). Panorama da Cacauicultura no Território Litoral Sul da Bahia 2015–2019. In L. VanWey, S. Porder, J. Chiapetti, D. Szerman, R. Rocha & D. Piotto (Eds.), Revelando desafios e oportunidades sociais, econômicas, e ecológicas para restauração de florestas em propriedades rurais na Mata Atlântica do Sul da Bahia 2015-2019. Ilhéus, BA: Instituto Floresta Viva. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://worldcocoafoundation.org/storage/files/panorama-da-cacauicultura-tilsb-versao-final-web.pdf.

CocoaAction Brazil. (2021a). Colhendo melhor, vendendo com mais lucro: boas práticas de colheita e processamento para impulsionar a qualidade do cacau. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCJsBxp1SdQ

CocoaAction Brazil. Instituto Arapyaú. WRI Brasil. (2021b). Viabilidade econômica de sistemas produtivos com cacau: Cabruca, Pleno Sol e Sistemas Agroflorestais nos estados da Bahia e do Pará. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://worldcocoafoundation.org/storage/files/viabilidade-economica-de-sistemas-produtivos-com-cacau-cabruca-pleno-sol-e-sistemas-agroflorestais-nos-estados-da-bahia-e-do-para-cocoaaction-brasil-instituto.pdf.

Costa, A. S., Malhado, A. C. M., Bragagnolo, C., Correia, R. A., & Ladle, R. J. (2016). Ecological outcomes of Atlantic Forest restoration initiatives by sugar cane producers. Land Use Policy, 52, 345-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.025

Costa, F. A. (2026). Agricultural intensification increases rather than reduces pressure on the Amazon Forest: Jevons’ paradox prevails in the cases of soy and cattle in Brazil (2001–2021). Land Use Policy, 160, 107842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107842

Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A., & Hansen, M. C. (2018). Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science, 361(6407), 1108-1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445

dos Reis, J. C., Kamoi, M. Y. T., Tanure, T. M. P., Rodrigues, M. I., Etienne, J. J. D., Valentim, J. F., Pereira, M. A., & Wruck, F. J. (2025). Integrated crop-livestock-forest systems: a path to improved agro-economic performance in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1518747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1518747

Duden, A. S., Verweij, P. A., Martensen, A. C., & Verburg, R. W. (2025). Drivers of reforestation across land-use sectors in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Land Use Policy, 150, 107477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107477

Durán, Y., Gómez-Valenzuela, V., & Ramírez, K. (2023). Socio-technical transitions and sustainable agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review of the literature 2010–2021. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1145263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1145263

Durigan, G., Guerin, N., & da Costa, J. N. M. N. (2013). Ecological restoration of Xingu Basin headwaters: motivations, engagement, challenges and perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368(1619), 20120165. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0165

El Bilali, H. (2019). The multi-level perspective in research on sustainability transitions in agriculture and food systems: A systematic review. Agriculture, 9(4), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9040074

Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423421.

Elzen, B., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2012). Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 4, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.006

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. (2021). Rede projeta 35 milhões de hectares com sistemas de ILPF até 2030. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.embrapa.br/en/busca-de-noticias/-/noticia/61192805/rede-projeta-35-milhoes-de-hectares-com-sistemas-de-ilpf-ate-2030.

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. (2023). Technical Note: Integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.embrapa.br/en/tema-integracao-lavoura-pecuaria-floresta-ilpf/nota-tecnica.

Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2013). Failure and success of transition initiatives: a study of the international replication of the transition movement. Research Policy, 42(6-7), 1517-1528.

Fernandes, V. M. A. (2008). Manejo de árvores em sistemas agroflorestais cacaueiros: percepção dos agricultores do Sul da Bahia, Brasil (Dissertação de mestrado). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/92076

Feyereisen, M., Stassart, P. M., & Mélard, F. (2017). Fair trade milk initiative in Belgium: bricolage as an empowering strategy for change. Sociologia Ruralis, 57(3), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12174

Freitas, M. G., Rodrigues, E. M., Campos-Filho, E. M., do Carmo, G. H. P., da Veiga, J. M., Junqueira, R. G. P., & Vieira, D. L. M. (2019). Evaluating the success of direct seeding for tropical forest restoration over ten years. Forest Ecology and Management, 438, 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.024

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8

Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003

Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science, 357(6357), 1242-1244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760

Gomes, L. C., Cardoso, I. M., Sá, E. M., Fernandes, R. B. A., Lopes, V. S., & Oliveira, T. S. (2016). Trees modify the dynamics of soil CO2 efflux in coffee agroforestry systems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 224, 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.001

Gurgel, A., Estevam, C. G., de Lima, C. Z., Pavão, E. de M., Queiroz, P., & Possamai, R. (2025). Potencial Econômico das Práticas Sustentáveis na Agricultura e Pecuária. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://institutoequilibrio.org.br/.

Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864-888. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527458

Henders, S., Persson, U. M., & Kastner, T. (2015). Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environmental Research Letters, 10(12), 125012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012

Holl, K. D. (2017). Restoring tropical forests from the bottom up. Science, 355(6324), 455-456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5432

Hommels, A., Peters, P., & Bijker, W. E. (2007). Techno therapy or nurtured niches? Technology studies and the evaluation of radical innovations. Research Policy, 36(7), 1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.002

Instituto Arapyaú (2021). Dados da flora das cabrucas e estimativa de estoque de carbono. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://arapyau.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/dados-da-flora-das-cabrucas-e-estimativa-de-estoque-de-carbono.pdf.

Instituto Escolhas (2015). Quanto Custa Reflorestar 12 Milhões de Hectares? Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://escolhas.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/92594f_b37a7ea57beb4bce85922381600631a0.pdf

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Synthesis Report. IPCC. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Synthesis Report. IPCC. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-29853-0

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2026). Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola. Tabela 2 - Área, Produção e Rendimento Médio - Confronto das safras de 2025 e das estimativas para 2026. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fftp.ibge.gov.br%2FProducao_Agricola%2FLevantamento_Sistematico_da_Producao_Agricola_%5Bmensal%5D%2FTabelas_xls%2F2026%2Flspa_202606_02.xls&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

König, C. C., & Pinsky, V. (2023). Bioeconomy: Brazilian potential and challenges. In N. Soendergaard, C. D. Sá, A. F. B. Platiau (Eds.), Sustainability Challenges of Brazilian Agriculture: Governance, Inclusion, and Innovation (pp. 271-293). Cham: Springer.

König, C. C., Saes, M. S. M., & Schnaider, P. S. B. (2024). How and why did the transition process towards a fully sustainable production of cocoa beans in Bahia (Brazil) take place? The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 27(3), 425-440. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2023.0049

Lapig-Remote Sensing. GIS Lab (2023). Atlas Digital das Pastagens Brasileiras. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://atlasdaspastagens.ufg.br/map.

Lima, M. A., Paciullo, D. S. C., Morenz, M. J. F., Gomide, C. A. M., Rodrigues, R. A. R., & Chizzotti, F. H. M. (2019). Productivity and nutritive value of Brachiaria decumbens and performance of dairy heifers in a long-term silvopastoral system. Grass and Forage Science, 74(1), 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12395

Lovejoy, T. E., & Nobre, C. (2019). Amazon tipping point: Last chance for action. Science Advances, 5(12), eaba2949. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba2949

Mattila, T. J., Hagelberg, E., Söderlund, S., & Joona, J. (2022). How farmers approach soil carbon sequestration? Lessons learned from 105 carbon-farming plans. Soil & Tillage Research, 215, 105204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105204

Nair, P. R. (2011). Agroforestry systems and environmental quality: introduction. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40(3), 784-790. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0076

New York Declaration on Forests. (2014). Declaration and Action Agenda. Climate Summit 2014. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://forestdeclaration.org/about/new-york-declaration-on-forests/

Newton, P., Gomez, A. E. A., Jung, S., Kelly, T., de Araújo Mendes, T., & Rasmussen, L. V. (2016). Overcoming barriers to low carbon agriculture and forest restoration in Brazil: The Rural Sustentável project. World Development Perspectives, 4, 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2016.11.011

Niederle, P. A. (2018). A pluralist and pragmatist critique of food regime’s genealogy: varieties of social orders in Brazilian agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(7), 1460-1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1313238

Nobre, M. M., & Oliveira, I. R. (2018). Agricultura de baixo carbono: tecnologias e estratégias de implantação. Brasília, DF: Embrapa. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.embrapa.br/en/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1101744/agricultura-de-baixo-carbono-tecnologias-e-estrategias-de-implantacao.

Nunes, F. S. M., Soares-Filho, B. S., Rajão, R., & Merry, F. (2017). Enabling large-scale forest restoration in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Environmental Research Letters, 12(4), 044022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6658

Observatório do Clima. 2025. Sistema de Estimativas de Emissões e Remoções de Gases de Efeito Estufa. SEEG. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://seeg.eco.br/#panorama

Oliveira, D. M., Santos, R. S., Chizzotti, F. H., Bretas, I. L., Franco, A. L., Lima, R. P., Freitas, D. A. F., Cherubin, M. R., & Cerri, C. E. P. (2024a). Crop, livestock, and forestry integration to reconcile soil health, food production, and climate change mitigation in the Brazilian Cerrado: a review. Geoderma Regional, 37, e00796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00796

Oliveira, M., Sandrini, M., & Alves, L. M. (2024b). Planaveg2.0: Brasil reafirma meta de 12 mi de hectares com novo plano de restauração. WRI Brazil. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.wribrasil.org.br/noticias/planaveg-20-brasil-reafirma-meta-de-12-mi-de-hectares-com-novo-plano-de-restauracao.

Oliveira, P. C. R., Gualda, G. A. F., Rossi, G. F., Camargo, A. F. M., Filoso, S., Brancalion, P. H., & Ferraz, S. F. B. (2025). Forest restoration improves habitat and water quality in tropical streams: a multiscale landscape assessment. The Science of the Total Environment, 963, 178256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178256

Paciullo, D. S. C., Fernandes, P. B., Carvalho, C. A. B., Morenz, M. J. F., Lima, M. A., Maurício, R. M., & Gomide, C. A. M. (2021). Pasture and animal production in silvopastoral and open pasture systems managed with crossbred dairy heifers. Livestock Science, 245, 104426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104426

Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J., Kastner, T., Moran, D., Schmidt, S., & Wood, R. (2019). Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Global Environmental Change, 56, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.002

Perfecto, I., & Vandermeer, J. (2008). Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems: a new conservation paradigm. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1134(1), 173-200. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.011

Pienkowski, T., Freni Sterrantino, A., Tedesco, A. M., Clark, M., Brancalion, P. H. S., Jagadish, A., Mendes, A., Pugliese de Siqueira, L., & Mills, M. (2024). Spatial predictors of landowners’ engagement in the restoration of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. People and Nature, 7(1), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10765

Polidoro, J. C., Freitas, P. L., Hernani, L. C., Anjos, L. H. C., Rodrigues, R. D. A. R., Cesário, F. V., Andrade, A. & Ribeiro, J. (2020). The impact of plans, policies, practices and technologies based on the principles of conservation agriculture in the control of soil erosion in Brazil. Preprints. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.authorea.com/doi/pdf/10.22541/au.158750264.42640167.

Rajão, R., Soares-Filho, B., Nunes, F., Börner, J., Machado, L., Assis, D., Oliveira, A., Pinto, L., Ribeiro, V., Rausch, L., Gibbs, H., & Figueira, D. (2020). The rotten apples of Brazil’s agribusiness. Science, 369(6501), 246-248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6646

Rangel, M. C., & Tonella, C. (2013). A crise da região cacaueira do sul da Bahia/Brasil e a reconstrução da identidade dos cacauicultores em contexto de adversidades. Geoingá: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia (UEM), 5(1), 77–101. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/Geoinga/article/download/49216/751375140376

Rattis, L., Brando, P. M., Macedo, M. N., Spera, S. A., Castanho, A. D. A., Marques, E. Q., Costa, N. Q., Silverio, D. V., & Coe, M. T. (2021). Climatic limit for agriculture in Brazil. Nature Climate Change, 11(12), 1098-1104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01214-3

Skorupa, L. A., Behling, M., & Porfirio-da-Silva, V. (2021). O eucalipto e os desafios para a transferência de tecnologias em sistemas de integração lavoura pecuária-floresta (ILPF). In Oliveira, E. B. (Ed.), O eucalipto e a Embrapa: Quatro décadas de pesquisa e desenvolvimento (pp. 1148-1160). Brasília, DF: Embrapa. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.embrapa.br/en/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1131510/o-eucalipto-e-a-embrapa-quatro-decadas-de-pesquisa-e-desenvolvimento

Rodrigues, R. D. A. R., Ferreira, I. G. M., Silveira, J. G., Silva, J. J. N., Santos, F. M., & Conceição, M. C. G. (2023). Crop-Livestock-Forest Integration Systems as a Sustainable Production Strategy in Brazil. In N. Soendergaard, C. D. Sá, A. F. B. Platiau (Eds.), Sustainability Challenges of Brazilian Agriculture: Governance, Inclusion, and Innovation (pp. 165-182). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29853-0_9.

Sá, C. D., König, C. C., & Søndergaard, N. (2022). Unlocking the Brazilian potential: the necessary incentives to engage farmers in decarbonization. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://de.apdbrasil.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Unlocking-the-brazilian-potential-EN.pdf.

Sales, G. P. S., Costa, W. S., Pierre, R. M., Callado, C. H., & Guedes-Bruni, R. R. (2026). Uncovering the First Reforestation Project in the 19th Century Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest: insights from wood anatomy and historical analysis. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 14(1), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2026.141023

Sambuichi, R. H. R., & Haridasan, M. (2007). Recovery of species richness and conservation of native Atlantic Forest trees in the cacao plantations of southern Bahia in Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(13), 3681-3701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9017-x

Silva, M. A. P., Schweizer, D., Rodrigues, H., & Marques, A. M. (2017). Can current native tree seedling production and infrastructure meet an increasing forest restoration demand in Brazil? Restoration Ecology, 25(4), 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12470

Silva, M. A. S. (2013). Conservação produtiva: manejo do sombreamento no sistema cabruca, região cacaueira da Bahia (Dissertação de mestrado). ESCAS/IPÊ, Uruçuca, BA. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from https://www.escas.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CONSERVACAO-PRODUTIVA-MANEJO-DO-SOMBREAMENTO-NO-SISTEMA-CABRUCA-REGIAO-CACAUEIRA-DA-BAHIA.pdf.

Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025-1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012

Soendergaard, N., Sá, C. D., Portilho, L. M. L., & König, C. C. (2021). Brazilian Agriculture in a World of Carbon Pricing: Challenges and Opportunities.. Retrieved in 2023, September 23, from rs/March2023/f0XTLecyiTXVCTaeNIC0.pdf.

Souza, H. N., Graaff, J., & Pulleman, M. M. (2012). Strategies and economics of farming systems with coffee in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome. Agroforestry Systems, 84(2), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9452-x

Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., de Vries, W., Vermeulen, S. J., Herrero, M., Carlson, K. M., Jonell, M., Troell, M., DeClerck, F., Gordon, L. J., Zurayk, R., Scarborough, P., Rayner, M., Loken, B., Fanzo, J., Godfray, H. C. J., Tilman, D., Rockström, J., & Willett, W. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562(7728), 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0

Strassburg, B. B., Barros, F. S., Crouzeilles, R., Iribarrem, A., Santos, J. S. D., Silva, D., Sansevero, J. B. B., Alves-Pinto, H. N., Feltran-Barbieri, R., & Latawiec, A. E. (2016). The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: a case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica, 48(6), 890-899. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12393

Strassburg, B. B., Brooks, T., Feltran-Barbieri, R., Iribarrem, A., Crouzeilles, R., Loyola, R., Latawiec, A. E., Oliveira Filho, F. J. B., Scaramuzza, C. A. M., Scarano, F. R., Soares-Filho, B., & Balmford, A. (2017). Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nature Ecology Evolution, 1, 0099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0099

Toto, R., Alix-García, J., Sims, K. R., Coutinho, B., Muñoz Brenes, C., Pugliese, L., & Mendes, A. F. (2025). Evidence on scaling forest restoration from the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact in Brazil. Nature Communications, 16(1), 4715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59194-3

Urzedo, D. I., Neilson, J., Fisher, R., & Junqueira, R. G. P. (2020). A global production network for ecosystem services: the emergent governance of landscape restoration in the Brazilian Amazon. Global Environmental Change, 61, 102059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102059

Urzedo, D. I., Vidal, E., Sills, O., Piña-Rodrigues, F. C. M., & Junqueira, R. G. P. (2016). Tropical forest seeds in the household economy: effects of market participation among three sociocultural groups in the Upper Xingu region of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Conservation, 43(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892915000247

Willett, W., Rockstrom, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., Jonell, M., Clark, M., Gordon, L. J., Fanzo, J., Hawkes, C., Zurayk, R., Rivera, J. A., De Vries, W., Majele Sibanda, L., Afshin, A., Chaudhary, A., Herrero, M., Agustina, R., Branca, F., Lartey, A., Fan, S., Crona, B., Fox, E., Bignet, V., Troell, M., Lindahl, T., Singh, S., Cornell, S. E., Srinath Reddy, K., Narain, S., Nishtar, S., & Murray, C. J. L. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 393(10170), 447-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4

Zu Ermgassen, E. K. H. J., Alcântara, M. P., Balmford, A., Barioni, L., Neto, F. B., Bettarello, M. M. F., Brito, G., Carrero, G. C., Florence, E. A. S., Garcia, E., Gonçalves, E. T., Da Luz, C. T., Mallman, G. M., Strassburg, B. B. N., Valentim, J. F., & Latawiec, A. (2018). Results from on-the-ground efforts to promote sustainable cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon. Sustainability (Basel), 10(4), 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041301
 


Submetido em:
23/09/2025

Aceito em:
18/05/2026

Publicado em:
19/08/2026

6a85e0f3a9539539283fff56 resr Articles
Links & Downloads

resr

Share this page
Page Sections